Dspace @ IIM Kozhikode

8. Distressed Elephants: Policy Initiatives for Sustainable Groundwater Management in India

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dinesh Kumar, M
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-22T06:57:24Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-22T06:57:24Z
dc.date.issued 2016-01
dc.identifier.issn 2277-9752
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2259/845
dc.description IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review 5(1) 51–62 © 2016 Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode en_US
dc.description.abstract This article reviews the dominant arguments which shaped public policies in the agricultural groundwater sector in India. It also examines the initiatives to arrest groundwater depletion. It is a synthesis of the research carried out by the author over the last two decades and review of the work by others. Following were the arguments that shaped public policies in the agricultural groundwater sector in India, as per the review: high density of farm wells in remote areas increases the transaction cost of metering and charging for electricity on a pro-rata basis, as a tool to control groundwater draft; groundwater economy is controlled by small and marginal farmers, and attempts to regulate it are politically sensitive; and raising power tariff would adversely affect farmers who buy water. Furthermore, the regions with high density of wells do not experience intensive groundwater use; groundwater economy is mainly controlled by large farmers. In water-abundant regions, subsidized power does not reduce the monopoly of water sellers; in water-scarce regions, an increase in power tariff would have only marginal effect on it; and, in semi-arid regions, raising farm power tariff would result in improved efficiency, equity and sustainability in groundwater use and would be socio-economically viable. In water-scarce regions, the large public funds spent for watershed management, dug well recharging and communitybased water harvesting produce no positive outcomes. Attempts to introduce electricity pricing or groundwater taxes or water rights are absent. Schemes promoting the use of micro irrigation do raise farm productivity, but leave no incentive among farmers to reduce water use. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sage Publications en_US
dc.subject Well owners en_US
dc.subject Water buyers en_US
dc.subject Groundwater economy en_US
dc.subject Micro irrigation en_US
dc.subject Electricity pricing en_US
dc.subject Water rights en_US
dc.title 8. Distressed Elephants: Policy Initiatives for Sustainable Groundwater Management in India en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • January [12]
    2016: Vol 5 (1): 1-106

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account